Category: Life

  • IFTA: All in the wording…

    In my new work we deal with a lot of taxes. In fairness, I do very little with the actual taxes. No, I have fun building the spreadsheets that calculate them–which I can say is rather nerve racking as the Federal Government is not very forgiving when mistakes are made–but I digress.

    One of our most frequent taxes is called the International Fuel Tax Agree (or IFTA). It applies to the United States and most of Canada and was developed as a way to avoid the old method of making a truck register for fuel taxes in each state they would be traveling through. So, in general, IFTA was a really good idea all around.

    One day my boss asked if I could make a diagram that explains how IFTA works so our clients could better understand it.

    I said, “Sure… How does it work?” In defense of my question, I knew how it worked because I reviewed the formulas that make up the calculations that determine the taxes we report. I was really hoping for exactly what my boss gave me: an oral version of the formulas, which follow:

    Total miles / Total gallons = MPG
    State miles / MPG = Taxable gallons
    Taxable gallons – Gallons bought in the State = Net taxable gallons
    Net taxable gallons * Tax rate = Tax due

    It is no wonder to me that people get confused on how the tax works. After a few minutes, it hit me: IFTA is actually very simple. Instead of thinking about the formulas we use to generate taxes amounts, I just had to think about what the tax was actually taxing (the key is in the MPG calculations). Thus, the grand conclusion is that IFTA is a calculation of fuel consumed while traveling through the state. In other words, how much fuel would you have needed to buy to operate in a given state. Sure, there is some averaging in there, but that is just to make it calculate easier.

    It felt good to take something as complicated as the robust formulas and summarize it in a handful of words.

    IFTA: A tax on the fuel you used in a state.

    (Okay, two handfuls and a toe, but it is still much less complicated than the original formulas. A copy of the diagram is attached for amusement.)

    How IFTA is Calculated. ©2012, used by permission. Details available upon request.

  • The Ambient Exchange of Knowledge

    Note: I wrote this back when I was an intern for a certain government research facility. I wrote it on the long the (2 hour) bus ride from “the site” and edited the next day on the same, long bus ride. I have included some additional thought in italics.

    Working for a government contractor (basically the government) has been an interesting experience. Of course there have the normal “we can’t do that” and “we have to submit the change for approval” (it took more than 5 months to get approval to change minor wording on a post-training survey) but there has also been an interesting transition as they have been cutting staff.

    The need and want to cut cost is present in every company I can think of and has the oblivious benefit of making the company more profitable. There is, however, an interesting and unfortunate side effect to these cost cutting efforts: innovation is stifled.

    Time and again, there is a clear pattern of disparate entities getting together and sparking evolutionary or revolutionary changes seemingly based on their proximity alone. (Duncan Hines revolutionary invention of cake mix came when a baking guy was having lunch with a powdered soap guy and they developed a method of creating the liquid mix and then spraying it onto screen for powdering like the soap guys did; Post-it notes’ evolutionary invention came about when one inventor created the weak, reusable glue and the other found a use for it; and many more, if you do some digging.) Ideas that otherwise would have taken a long time to come about, if they ever emerged. Which then confuses me as to why you would be stripping away most of the opportunities for new, innovative ideas by saddling down employees with so much work (by cutting down the help for those tasks) that they have no chance to interact with others. It would seem that instead of cutting everything down, companies should set more people free: free to interact with and learn about other departments, free to dream, free to bear those dreams into reality, free to create new revenue streams.

    But then, what do I know about “the real world,” I am just an intern who created a website in a week that took other departments several months to do.

    P.S. Can I mention that because the web programmer (namely me) was working with “the site” management while hanging out with the Training department instructors and cavorting with the PR people, he was able to completely redesign their daily internal publication in a way that greatly improved the appeal and readability of the content? How? By asking why people never read the publication. No magic, just someone who could do something being around people with good ideas.

  • Happy Guy Fawkes Day!

    Today is the day that Guy Fawkes, and company, did not blow up the English parliament in 1605. You can read more about it on Wikipedia, here.

    Why should you care about Guy Fawkes day? The same reason why we celebrate Saint Patrick’s Day. Namely, to have fun. In England, Guy Fawkes Day celebrations consist of making an effigy of Guy Fawkes and then burning it (well, they do more but those parts are not as fun). If we were really cool we would have fireworks to set off too.

  • Why I Love Reading the I Ching

    After the huge Charley Harper: An Illustrated Life by Todd Oldham (the book is 17.7 inches by 12.6 inches and 2 inches thick)–which I finally broke down and bought*–and Envisioning Information by Edward Tufte, the book I check out most from the library is The Original I Ching Oracle by Rudolf Ritsema and Shantena Augusto Sabbadini:

    The “I Ching” sitting in all its glory on a table.
    I do not like the actual book much, so I was pondering why I keep checking it out. Here are the reasons I came up with.

    1. The actual title just begs respect for its simultaneous antiquity and epical nature: “The Original I Ching Oracle: The Pure and Complete Texts with Concordance, Translated under the auspices of the Eranos Foundation”. How can I resist a title with “oracle,” “concordances” AND “auspices” in it?
    2. The sheer thickness of the book. While Amazon.com reports an original copy to be 2.5 inches thick, I think the library copy has matured to a full 3 inches. A book that thick demands the respect of everyone in the vicinity.
    3. The giant Chinese character on the front. I generally get two reactions from people after they have comprehended the thickness of the book and the prominent Chinese characters on the front: “I am so sorry that you have to read that. What class are you reading it for so I can make sure to never take it?” or “Are you learning Chinese?” Sometimes when I get the first response, if I am feeling particularly mischievous, I tell them it is for the Capstone class (a class that, in theory, each graduate has to take after the first two years of schooling).
    4. The inside is filled with even more Chinese characters.
    5. Running through an I Ching with someone is fun, if not informative. (For those who do not know, as I did not know when I first checked the book out: you roll three coins, or other two sided objects, three times and based on the combination of heads and tails the I Ching gives a fortune. You can read more about it on Wikipedia.)
    6. I Ching fortunes can be fun to read and piece together. Fortune may be too strong of a word, they are more of guiding phrases and less of “fortunes” in the Fortune Cookie sense.
    7. Reading a lot of wise I Ching phrases allows one to then spout those exact or similar phrases back like, “white noise can bring both clarity and confusion” or “feed to hungry tiger before it finds a new master”, thus sounding both profound and wise while not actually having said anything of substance.
    8. The I Ching brings me a bit of culture that I rather enjoy.
    While I would not recommend this book for reading, I would suggest it for browsing. It is fun to flip through its pages and read the bits of wisdom scatter throughout it.
    * On having bought Charley Harper: An Illustrated Life by Todd Oldham: I was going to include this in the body, but it got way too long. I guess it shows, in part, how much I love this book: I actually bought a slightly smaller copy, 12 inches by 8.5 inches by 1.5 inches, which i deemed more reasonable for the portability my nearby transient lifestyle currently requires. I bought it shortly before graduation, before I knew where I would be living after I graduated and after realizing that I did not know if my next library would have a copy of this amazing book and noting that I had nearly, single handedly, filled up the return date card.
  • In celebration of 300 posts

    (Click to view a larger version of the image.)

    Yes, indeed, this is the 300th post. It seems like just yesterday that I hit 200.