My security tips: Daniel’s Security Tips.docx
Category: Life
-
Thoughts about math
Math is a beautiful part of our daily life, it is something that allows us to understand and communicate about the world with precision. While I have little raw calculating power in my head, I love what math allows us to do. I also love what math does to me.
I had a college algebra teacher who once explained why we learn. It is not because we actually need to do calculations daily (we have calculators for that) but because math changes the way we think and the changed thinking allows us to grasp things bigger than us all.
The idea of variable, for example, is key to algebra and calculus but it is also key to living well. How early do you need to leave to make it to work on time? Variable answer that. My commute looks like this: a + b + c = u Where a is the time it takes me to get from my house to the freeway, b is the time I spend on the freeway and c is the time it takes to get from the freeway to the parking lot. Any one of those legs can be adjusted and tweaked to allow me to predict my commute time.
So remember, understanding math (not just being able to calculate numbers in your head) can literally revolutionize your life.
-
“Never come in early” and other workplace fallacies
“Never come in early,” said the middle aged man. He was giving advice for my working life. This was my first job and he was sort of a friend/mentor (I was too young to know these things).
“Never stay late,” was his other maxim. “That’s how they get you,” was his reasoning. “They start asking you to come in earlier and earlier and they make you stay later and later. All without paying you a dime more.”
In hindsight I hear his words with some embitterment that probably came from a long exposure to corporate abuse.
While not really purposeful, I generally followed his advice. I never planned to come in early (more than 15 minutes before my shift was scheduled) and never planned to stay late, unless there was due compensation agreed on beforehand.
As I have worked through the years, and have matured, I have noticed that many people hold this mentality and many companies (regardless of their stated workplace environment policies) foster a place that reinforces this behavior. The mantra from both sides: “Do your job, keep your head down, attract as little attention as possible.”
Many people like to think they are bold, open and engaging, they are not really. Employees are frequently encouraged to be social and interactive with open employees but many attempts to learn about other peoples’ work are viewed as territorial challenges and are frequently met with subversive hostility and mistrust. “Why are you trying to learn my job?” is a common question. And a fair question. Many companies send unsuspecting individuals in to learn someones job for “redundancies” and “in case they ever go on vacation” then promptly learn off the teacher and replace them with the learner (who is often paid less).
While many companies say they want their employees to be happy and engaged in the workplace, they maintain strict policies of strong management oversight of minutia, accountability over trivial details and dysfunctional behavior towards those who reach outside their ordained silo.
Another issue is that many companies, and some employees, are old and have a long history. This means that there are many, many layers of politics and more delicate boats that cannot be rocked than can be found in the most intense daytime soap.
In hindsight, the saddest places I have worked were the ones that were deserted after 5pm. The places where no one wanted to stay a minute longer than they were supposed. Places where both the employees and the company were just putting in the hours.
In connection with my opening quote, I have realized that I never want to work for such a place where people flee the scene at the end of the work day.
Instead, I want to work at a place that I want to come in early and leave late every night; where the people are so engaging that I count working as “hanging out”; where the work is so interesting that I can hardly call it “work”; where the company is so open that I feel like I can roam free without judgment; where I can learn about other people’s jobs with interest and not be scorned for territorial challenges; where big picture thinking is encouraged, not just in words but in action; where my manager is transparent and open.
So, no more with “just putting in my time.” If time and money are they only things that get exchanged then the work is not worth either my time or my employers money.As I think about this, such a workplace requires effort from all the involved parties. Companies have to create an environment of trust where employees can appropriately share information freely without feeling like they need to keep secrets in order to keep their jobs. Employees need to be able to find their work interesting and engaging. This usually requires at least some perspective (many of the most boring tasks I have ever done at work were agreeable because I knew that my contribution was making an impact–not because I was told such but because I knew the big picture). Employee then need to act in this open environment. Being free is pointless if that freedom is not utilized.The cool part is that the companies that have open environments that employees utilize effectively are the companies that scare the pants off their competitors because those companies are the fastest, most agile and most prone to have a surprise that no one saw coming. -
Pictures: The Old, The New and The Digital
I had a recent realization: I take as many pictures in an average year as my grandparents did in their entire lifetime and as my parents did in the first 30 years of marriage.
EarlierThenNowAverage pictures taken per year 34 58 743 Cost of developing a roll of film $50 $10 free Relative cost for camera $140 $120 $150 Relative cost of color film per picture Color: $2.08
B&W: $1.00$.42 Free ‘Special’ shots Average number of pictures for a special event 1-5 2-10 5-100 Estimate of time put into ‘special’ shots 10 minutes 5 minutes .5 minutes Estimate of effort put into ‘special’ shots A lot Some Not much Believability of smiles in ‘special’ shots Not much Some A lot Estimate of duplicate ‘special’ shots 2 5 20 Casual shots Frequency of random, candid shots Few Some Too many Number of pictures you distributed and regretted Few Some Too many Number of steps to send distribute a ‘regretful’ picture Six: Find camera, remember to bring camera, pull out camera, take picture, develop the roll, mail picture to friends. Five: Remember to bring camera, pull out camera, take picture, develop the roll, mail picture to friends. Three: Pull out phone, snap picture, post to Facebook. Factor Method for ‘cool’ picture distribution Slideshow (usually with long, boring oratory) Prints in the mail Facebook Method for ‘average’ picture distribution Slideshow (usually with long, boring oratory) Prints in the mail Facebook Method for ‘mediocre’ picture distribution Slideshow (usually with long, boring oratory) Prints in the mail Facebook Method for ‘sub-par’ picture distribution Slideshow (usually with long, boring oratory) Prints in the mail Facebook Difficulty in taking ‘cool’ pictures and missing the ‘sub-par’ ones Hard Moderate Easy Appreciation Appreciation for ‘great’ shots High High Low Comments on ‘great’ shots “Wow” “Nice picture” “Photoshopped” Number of times ‘great’ shots are view again 10+ 5+ 0 (This data is based on pre-digital camera photography for “Earlier” and “Then” categories based on moderate research. All monetary figures are adjusted for inflation.)
In many ways the digital revolution of the camera has done a lot to make picture taking more accessible and less expensive but it has also robbed us of the ‘magic’ of those special moments we are seeking to preserve. It is that very word, “preserve”, that we find the core of the problem. We have shifted from ‘capturing a moment’ to trying ‘to preserve that moment so it lasts forever’. A shift from creating something to help us remember to trying to create something that can be relived on demand.
The shift from capture to preservation has been further driven by the extensive availability of video capture technology (video cameras built into our phones and digital cameras). It comes through in the way that we rabidly try to capture as many moments as possible in video but so rarely look back at the videos we have taken. It seems that such clips are only viewed in moments of great grieve or after severe tragedy. Perhaps that is the best place for them. After all, if you have the real person, place or thing available to you, why would you want to settle with watching old videos of them.
It only takes a couple of times of trying to capture a breathtaking sunset, and being disappointed by the results, to realize that most of life is better enjoyed the first time. Instead of trying to preserve each moment, try to soak in the moment and only snap a picture or two.
