- Humans make decisions by relativity
- With three options, we tend to buy the middle options
- We eschew difficult-to-compare options
- For example, comparing a colonial house to a contemporary house is difficult; add a second colonial house that needs some TLC, and we are driven to embrace the better colonial house
- When exposed to a new product, the first price is anchored or imprinted on us
- Arbitrary Coherence: Once an arbitrary anchor price is established, related prices are effect coherence
- We expect subsequent prices to file in alignment with the price; outliers are scrutinized or discarded
- Anchors are set when we consider buying something at a certain price
- Money is a very expense motivator
- Highly emotional states dramatically change our reaction to choose
- We are bad at predicting how we will react in high-emotion situations
- Dictated schedules has better performance than self-imposed schedules which have better performance than no schedule
- Higher prices often adjust our experiences
- Shifting our focus from price to product, we can counter the perceptional shift
- We think of dishonesty in such grand terms that our super ego does not register the small stuff
- People tend to cheat, a little, when they can; but recalling honor at the time of temptation, curbs their inclination
- The further away from cash you get (tokens, shares, items, etc.), the more dishonest people get
- People have a need to be unique, even to the detriment of their pleasure
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.