Category: Reading

  • “The Everything Store” by Brad Stone

    These are from my second reading

    • “Communication is a sign of dysfunction. It means people aren’t working together in a close, organic way. We should be trying to figure out a way for teams to communicate less with each other, not more.” Jeff Bezos
      • When people are synchronized, they do not need as much communication
  • “The Up Side of Down” by Megan McArdle

    Failure is often seen as a bad thing. When we fail in school, we cannot progress. When we fail a driving test, we are not permitted to drive. When we fail to deliver as work, we are often dismissed. Signs of the fear of failure pervade our culture. From crafting intricate lies hiding our failures to

  • “The Tyranny of Metrics” by Jerry Muller

    For almost as long as I have had a job, I have watched people use metrics to gauge performance. Many bosses live by the adage, “If you don’t measure it, you can’t improve it.” For almost as long as I have had a job, I have struggled with the notion that everything of value can be measured and thus improved.

    Muller’s book puts that sentiment into writing. Sourcing detailed accounts of how articulate measurements often go awry from their intention. Muller quotes Marilyn Strathern’s paraphrase of Goodhart’s law: “When a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure.”

    In our race for efficiency, we often expect metrics to manage things rather than people, assuming metrics never lie but neglecting the fact metrics also only tell a very narrow piece of the story.

  • “How Emotions Are Made” by Lisa Feldman Barrett

    Spending her career researching the brain in general, and emotions in particular, Barrett is able to illustrate how the classical framework of emotion is different from how things actually work. For example, in classical theory, the brain produces a universal emotion in response to a particular input. Barrett’s research shows quite a different story: different brains react differently to the same input, indicating that different people have different experiences even though we use the word to describe the emotion.

    Barrett reminds readers that the brain itself never experiences reality. Instead, it experiences life through a variety of sensory input (nerves that feel, eyes that see, ears that hear) and spends its existence bringing meaning to the signals it receives. All the world we know is a simulation based on sensory inputs and our predictions about what will happen next. For any given set of inputs, we run a number of simulations, discarding the ones that seem less likely.

    To efficiently handle these constant simulations the brain develops guides, Barrett calls “concepts”. Concepts allow the brain to quickly match a set of input patterns to responses. This allows the body to prepare, in advance of recognition, for the needed action.

    We start developing these concepts from infancy and continue to develop them as we age. Concepts are strongly influenced by our environment and how we see other people responding their simulations. This is in part what emotional outputs have so many different forms. Some people clench their fists in anger while others blush and turn silent. Some people cry with joy others only cry in pain.

    Concepts also inform our ability to identify and distinguish between different emotional states. Much like colors, people who were raised with a little emotional vocabulary tend to express themselves in few emotional states. People raised with a larger emotional vocabulary tend to express themselves with a larger range of emotions.

    I recently learned Schadenfreude (“…the experience of pleasure, joy, or self-satisfaction that comes from learning of or witnessing the troubles, failures, or humiliation of another.” Wikipedia). After having a word for the emotion, I find that I am more aware of the emotion than I was before. Barrett suggests this is not because I am actually experiencing the emotion more, rather that I recognize it when I do because I now have a word for it.

    Finally, Barrett presents a different model for mapping emotions. In the classic model, there are distinct “base” emotions that can be mixed and interchanged for a variety complex emotional states:
    Plutchik wheel

    In her research, Barrett found this was not representative what actually happens in the brain. Instead, people feel emotions in two emotional spectrums: arousal and valence (or pleasantness). An emotion like “anger” is unpleasant and may be arousing, if you are driven to action, or not arousing if you retreat within yourself.

  • “How We Decide” by Jonah Lehrer

    The decision process, something that we do hundreds of times a day, seems so straight-forward and natural but involves some really complex internal processes. Making a decision is a delightful orchestration of mental processing, short-term memory, long-term memory and some far reaching chemical processes.

    Interesting tidbit one: The more we think, the less we feel. Studies have shown that when people know how expensive something is, their enjoyment of it increases. However, when participating in blind taste tests (without knowing the price) they often enjoy the cheaper items more.

    Interesting tidbit two: The best way to make complex decisions is to study them, then distract yourself for a while (to let your subconscious process the information) then, suddenly, be forced to make a decision. This allows your intuition to pop out the results of your subconscious processing.